Skip to main content
DD-CAT IDE logoDD-CAT IDE

Article · Tech Insights

Online DC-DC Feedback Resistor Selection Tool: Pick Standard Resistor Values Directly from Vref and Target Voltage

Favorite

An online tool for calculating DC-DC feedback divider resistors: enter the feedback reference Vref and target output voltage, and it enumerates the lowest-error R1/R2 combinations from E3–E192 standard resistor series, with actual output voltage, error, and divider current. Notes from several real uses.

ShareWeiboXLinkedIn

Key points

The DC-DC feedback resistor selection tool (https://www.dd-cat.cn/tools/dcdc-feedback) finds the lowest-error R1/R2 resistor combinations from the E3–E192 standard series based on the feedback reference voltage Vref and target output voltage. For Vref=0.8V and Vout=3.3V, the E96 series recommends 357 kΩ/115 kΩ (actual 3.2835V, 0.50% error, about 7µA divider current), while the E24 series gives 750 kΩ/240 kΩ (actual 3.3000V, 0.000% error). The tool also lists up to five alternative combinations with actual output voltage, error, and divider current, and provides a 50µA–1mA rule-of-thumb range for divider current. Users should compare both error and divider current rather than choosing only by lowest error, since the top error-ranked pair may have poor noise immunity.

While tuning DC-DC converters on a few boards recently, the most annoying part wasn't picking the controller—it was the two output divider resistors: anyone can write the formula Vout = Vref × (1 + R1/R2), but when it comes to resistor values you can actually buy, I used to go back and forth against the E96 table. Then I found an online DC-DC feedback resistor selection tool: enter Vref and the target voltage, and it directly lists the standard resistor combinations with the smallest error. I wrote down the usage and a few real sessions as notes for later.

Tool URL: https://www.dd-cat.cn/tools/dcdc-feedback

Three inputs, and the output is combinations you can actually buy

There are three inputs: the feedback reference Vref (given in the datasheet; common values are 0.6 / 0.75 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.21 V), the target output voltage Vout, and the resistor series (E3 to E192).

What it does: first it calculates the ideal ratio ratio = (Vout − Vref) / Vref, then iterates over every R2 in the selected series, picks the R1 closest to the ideal ratio for each R2, computes the actual output voltage and error, and finally returns the top six sorted by error from lowest to highest.

It outputs the following:

  • Recommended R1 (top) / R2 (bottom): the pair with the smallest error, with the actual output voltage shown;
  • Alternatives 1–5: other combinations with similar error, each row showing actual Vout and error;
  • Divider current: Vout / (R1+R2), with a rule-of-thumb reference of 50µA–1mA;
  • Recommended combination error: the percentage error for that pair.

Next to it is a Buck feedback divider diagram with the calculated values marked on R1 and R2, Vref marked on the FB pin, and the actual voltage marked on the output.

One real use: trade-offs for a 3.3V output

The default parameters are the most common case: Vref = 0.8V, Vout = 3.3V, E96 series. The ideal ratio is (3.3 − 0.8)/0.8 = 3.125, and the tool recommends 357 kΩ / 115 kΩ, with an actual output of about 3.2835V and 0.50% error.

But there's a catch worth noting: this pair draws only 7 µA of divider current, below the tool's 50µA–1mA rule-of-thumb range. The divider branch resistance is too high, making the FB node impedance high and more sensitive to noise and leakage current. Fortunately, the "Alternatives" in the output list other magnitudes of the same ratio: 35.7 kΩ / 11.5 kΩ (about 70µA divider current) and 3.57 kΩ / 1.15 kΩ (about 0.70mA), both with the same 0.50% error.

I usually choose this way: in a normal noise environment where light-load power matters, use the hundreds-of-kΩ range; on a board with heavy switching noise and long traces, move down to the tens-of-kΩ range and trade a little more quiescent loss for noise immunity. The tool puts "error" and "divider current" in the same table, so the trade-off is easy to see.

An example where E24 actually gives zero error

Still using 3.3V / 0.8V, switch the series to E24 (±5%) and the recommended pair becomes 750 kΩ / 240 kΩ, with an actual output of exactly 3.3000V and 0.000% error. The reason is that 240k × 3.125 = 750k divides evenly, and 7.5 and 2.4 are both E24 base values—so the classic 7.5 kΩ / 2.4 kΩ (or 75k / 24k) set hits 3.3V exactly.

This shows that "higher series precision" and "the ratio happens to align" are two different things: E96 has denser base values, but the 3.125 ratio simply doesn't land on an E96 integer ratio, while E24 does. The tool computes both series, so you can use whichever is more accurate.

Three other scenarios I used

1.2V core voltage (Vref = 0.8V)

The ideal ratio is 0.5, meaning R1 : R2 = 1 : 2. The tool gives 232 kΩ / 464 kΩ, with an actual output of 1.2000V and zero error. This integer ratio hits many E96 combinations, so just pick a magnitude with a suitable divider current.

1.8V (Vref = 0.6V)

The ideal ratio is 2.0, meaning R1 : R2 = 2 : 1. The recommendation is 464 kΩ / 232 kΩ, giving 1.8000V with zero error. For chips with a 0.6V Vref (common on many low-voltage Bucks), enter 0.6.

5V (Vref = 0.8V)

The ideal ratio is 5.25, and the recommendation is 147 kΩ / 28 kΩ, giving 5.0000V with zero error and about 28.6µA of divider current. If noise immunity matters more, the alternatives include the 10.5k / 2k magnitude (about 0.4mA divider current).

Common combinations quick reference

VrefTarget VoutIdeal R1/R2Recommended pair (example)Actual Vout
0.8V3.3V3.125357 kΩ / 115 kΩ (E96)3.2835V (0.50%)
0.8V3.3V3.1257.5 kΩ / 2.4 kΩ (E24)3.3000V (0.00%)
0.8V1.2V0.5232 kΩ / 464 kΩ1.2000V (0.00%)
0.6V1.8V2.0464 kΩ / 232 kΩ1.8000V (0.00%)
0.8V5.0V5.25147 kΩ / 28 kΩ5.0000V (0.00%)

A few notes

  • Don't only look at error when checking divider current: the tool sorts by error, and the lowest-error pair may draw only a few µA. A rule of thumb is 50µA–1mA to balance power and noise immunity; choose the hundreds-of-kΩ range when Buck light-load efficiency is sensitive.
  • R1 goes to the output, R2 to ground: R1 is the upper resistor and R2 the lower one, with FB taken from the middle. Swap them and the divider relationship is reversed.
  • Choose the series by tolerance: E96 is ±1%, E192 is ±0.5%, and E24 is ±5%. When tight error is required, or the best combination still exceeds 1% error, switch to E192/E96 or fine-tune the target voltage to absorb the error.
  • Keep the feedback trace short: keep the FB trace as short as possible and away from switching nodes and the inductor, and add the FB filter capacitor per the datasheet. No matter how accurate the resistor values are, layout that couples switching noise in will defeat them.
  • Use the datasheet Vref: 0.6 / 0.75 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.21 V are all common. Enter the wrong reference and every combination that follows will be wrong.

Conclusion

The hard part of feedback resistors isn't the formula—it's that the calculated ideal values can't be bought. This tool does all three steps at once: enumerating standard resistor values, calculating error, and comparing divider current. I basically take the chip's Vref and the desired Vout, enter them, pick a pair, double-check the divider current, and move on. The link is bookmarked alongside my divider and RC filter tools.

Get new articles by email

Enter your email — we notify you about new articles and releases (unsubscribe anytime).

Related reading

Tech Insights

MOS 管参数速查:水闸讲清工作区、损耗、小信号、SOA 与选型折中(附数据手册读法)

MOS 管的数据手册动辄二十页,真正决定设计成败的只有十几行和几条曲线。这篇用「城堡水闸」把阈值电压、过驱动、R_DS(on)、跨导、Qg、米勒平台串成一条线,再单独讲清两件最容易含糊的事:饱和区的小信号模型(gm、ro、Cgs、Cgd 到底怎么来)和安全工作区 SOA(为什么功率没超却会炸)。配七张手绘图(含选型四象限图)、一个 30 V/5 mΩ 的损耗与结温迭代算例、两颗管的 FOM 与损耗对比,最后是数据手册的三看三不看——包括「标称 60 A 实际只能用 20 A」。

Tech Insights

童话版基尔霍夫定律:两条铁律,一篇讲清 KCL、KVL 和方向里的负号

KCL 和 KVL 是电路分析的地基,但真正让人翻车的从来不是公式,而是参考方向、电源升降和「什么时候不能直接用」。我用一个森林引水渠的童话把两条铁律讲清:分水桩进出相等(KCL)、绕渠一圈水位回到原处(KVL),再配一个 12 V/6 V 三支路实例手算到 1.6 A、−1.2 A、−0.4 A,并用功率守恒验算,最后是 4 条最容易踩的注意事项(含变压器磁芯回路为什么不能乱用 KVL)。

Tech Insights

童话版诺顿定理:泉眼、暗渠、两个公式,外加 6 条注意事项

诺顿定理其实是戴维南的「并联兄弟」,但很多人只会背不会用,还容易把电流源方向标反、真去短接量短路电流。我用同一个黑箱城堡的第二个童话把三件事串起来:短接出口量流量得 I_N、熄灯量内阻得 R_N、整座城堡折叠成一个恒定泉眼并联一条暗渠;再补上电流分流公式、12 V 分压器的数值试炼、与戴维南的互换,以及 6 条实战注意事项。